Re: The real problem for restarting sports in high schools

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ SoCalHoops Womens Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Let's Get Real on May 13, 2020 at 11:48:39:

In Reply to: Re: The real problem for restarting sports in high schools posted by hedleylamarr on May 12, 2020 at 12:16:12:

: : : : : : : : : : : : : :
: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Walt, do you think we should shut down the entire world economy for months if it were to save just one human life?

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : That's a fine bit of reductio ad absurdum arguing you've got going there.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : : Walt's Dog

: : : : : : : : : : : : : : Thanks. Feel free to answer the question.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : What exactly are you trying to prove with that question? World leaders make awful decisions that cost lives in nearly every crisis. If you're one person making the decision for a loved one, then it's worth it. That has no actual bearing on this situation.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : Some historians believe Truman dropped the A-bomb on Japan only to prevent Russia from being part of the negotiations for surrender, fearing Japan would be split in two as Germany was. This theory is supported by the Allied firebombing of Dresden, completely unnecessary to the advance on Berlin. The Allies chose to not aid the Red Army's offensive on the German capital with a more suitable target, even though it may have ended the war sooner and saved tend of thousands of Holocaust victims.

: : : : : : : : : : : : : Further supporting the theory is the Allied request for Russia to refrain from entering the Pacific War for three months after May 8th, which Stalin adhered to. The Cold War was underway before any treaties were signed.

: : : : : : : : : : : : You're getting off topic. Many of us are not at high risk to die from Coronavirus. There are plenty of ways to protect those who are at high risk without closing down our entire economy.

: : : : : : : : : : : : The question of how many lives we need to save in order to justify shutting down our entire economy is exactly what the issue is. You may not be comfortable with having it spelled out so coldly, but that is the issue at hand.

: : : : : : : : : : : : Do we all stop driving cars because someone was killed in an automobile accident? Or stop flying in airplanes because an airplane crashed? Do we forgo personal hygiene because someone slipped in the shower and died?

: : : : : : : : : : : : Life is about managing risk. We are all going to die eventually, it's just a matter of making smart decisions to preserve your life as long as you reasonably can. But what demands should one individual be able to make upon society as a whole in order to preserve their life? What about a small minority of people?

: : : : : : : : : : : : These are the questions that we should be answering. Should a parent who wants the best for their child - be that an education, or the opportunity to play sports - have to sacrifice all of that for the sake of saving a small handful of high risk people? Exactly what demands can the individual make of society?

: : : : : : : : : : :
: : : : : : : : : : : Still more germane than airplanes or cigarettes...airplanes don't kill more people exponentially as more fly, neither do cigarettes if you smoke more (and there are laws against where you can consume these).

: : : : : : : : : : : Shutting down the economy has drawbacks and will also destroy lives. But letting society continue as it was through a pandemic would be economic suicide. One concern out of many: who would drive buses and operate trains? NYC lost 41 transit workers in a few weeks, with nearly half of the workforce out sick in early April. The MTA was so shorthanded, train service was cut, leaving trains packed - even with most of NY staying home.

: : : : : : : : : : : New York also issued a DNR order to it's paramedics last month, patients who were "legally dead" would no longer be rushed to hospitals for life-saving procedures.

: : : : : : : : : : : Suppose NY stayed open this whole time...what do you say to people when 911 emergency stops sending ambulances for people dying from the virus when ventilators and PPE run out? Central Park has only so much space, and the Navy has a limited number of hospital ships. Doctors who hadn't yet graduated from medical school were called into service. 13k dead in the city as is, with at most 3% (a high estimate) of the city infected.

: : : : : : : : : : : Let's imagine life with no shutdown, where that number went from 3% to 30% over the past six weeks...and remember the most vulnerable include those who would be most exposed to the virus, not only the infirm. That means many essential workers (grocery/transit/police/fire/medics/food service) would be dying/sick/striking.

: : : : : : : : : : : I share the sentiment of wanting to re-open once the virus slows to a certain point (R0=0.5), but re-opening sooner than that, and letting the virus take it's course could lead to a breakdown of society. Unfortunately since sports aren't "essential", they carry a huge liability.

: : : : : : : : : : What I'm suggesting is that there are more than two options: Open and Closed. How about "Open, but high risk workers stay at home?" Doesn't that seem smarter than paying every family in America with taxpayer funds? How about "Open, but you wear a mask if you want to get on a bus?" There are plenty of options, so why aren't we exploring them?

: : : : : : : : : Sounds logical, but so many essential workers become high risk, as their jobs force them to come into close contact with a high volume of people every day. Even the healthy die when they get a large enough cumulative exposure to the virus, Italy lost over 60 doctors to this in a couple months. By November, there should at least be proven treatments for this virus, and the debate to stay open won't involve condemning hundreds of thousands more to death. But the world was caught with it's pants down in February when this novel virus (the novelty is the problem) spread out of China, and a drastic shutdown was the only way to avoid even more chaos.

: : : : : : : : Italy has had just under 29K deaths...compared to a population of over 60 million. That is, less 0.05% of their population has died from the coronavirus. Italy has one of the oldest populations in the world, with 23% of their population 65 or older which is one of the reasons why they have been so adversely affected.

: : : : : : : : 5 people out of 10,000 is a tragedy, but is it a reason to shut down for months? No. Not when we are able to control the spread of the virus by behaving responsibly, limiting contact, washing our hands, self-quarantining if sick or at high risk, and wearing a mask. The money that we are paying millions of people to stay home and watch Netflix could be put to better use setting up care programs for the sick or at-risk, or researching vaccines, or hiring additional health care workers.

: : : : : : : Italy has 5 people out of 10,000 dead, but were so overwhelmed the dead were sometimes left to rot at home for days. Spain has a slightly worse death rate, about 5.4 per 10k. Spain has a younger median age (and fewer over 65) than Italy. Germany has a higher median age than Italy and was hit one-sixth as hard, Italy's problem was their two-way tourism with China; while the US closed the border with China, Italy did not.

: : : : : : : Two nations worth comparing are Greece and Sweden, Sweden has a death rate nearly 20 times higher than Greece. Greece shut down, Sweden did not. Both countries have roughly 10 million people, but Sweden is three and a half times the size of Greece. Both have a large over-65 population.

: : : : : : : Sweden has a couple reasons to stay open, there are only two metro areas with over 1 million people, and two thirds of the population lives in a town of 150k or smaller. Though the two largest cities should have enacted more restrictions.

: : : : : : : Sweden has about 30% more deaths per million people than the USA, and 225% more deaths than LA county, despite being 40 times the size of the latter. Both have ~10 million people.

: : : : : : : The R=0 was out of control, behaving responsibly and washing hands while wearing masks wouldn't have slowed transmission of the virus significantly, had those been the only precautions taken since March. Self-quarantining by the sick doesn't do enough either, see the link below.

: : : : : : : But there is a chance to beat the virus by re-opening with precautions, after the R=0 drops below 0.5. At that point the transmission rate of the virus may not accelerate fast enough to get above 1 before it dies out...for now. The R=0 would never have gotten below 1 without a shutdown or MASSIVE testing at the onset of the virus, which is what South Korea did, along with surveillance.

: : : : : : I'm not going to debate you point by point because you said the magic words: re-opening with precautions. I don't think we need to wait for the R0 to drop because, again, we are dealing with a fairly harmless virus when considered on a macro scale. Those in high risk groups should continue to self-isolate, while those in lower risk categories can take the basic precautions and be just fine.

: : : : : : Fortunately Governor Newsome agreed to start slowly re-opening so we'll see how that goes. Obviously if the entire population of California starts magically dropping dead we'll realize the wrong decision has been made. But I don't think that's going to happen.

: : : : :
: : : : : LOL at fairly harmless virus. Sports will be the last thing to come back since there is so much exposure to so many people. We should all just get real and stick to basketball.

: : : : It's sad to see how many people have a religious-like belief in self-quarantine. There will always be a harmful virus that will always have the potential to kill you. But by all means, go ahead and abandon life so you can live longer.

: : : The point, of course, is that you do not have power to tell anyone what to do, how to think, or how to live their lives. This is a high school girls basketball forum. Pontificate all you want, your opinion on this topic means jack. People much smarter than me, and certainly much smarter than you, will make these decisions as to when it is safe to return. If you want to be involved in such decisions, if you are so evolved that you think you can tell everyone that it's safe because you say it is, then, by all means go work for the Governor's office, and let the basketball coaches coach, and talk about the sport we love. Your responses prove you only care about yourself, and have no respect for either others opinions, or their lives. Better yet, go work for Trump, you'll fit right in.

: : Your opinion also means jack. I'll feel free to keep expressing mine. It's a small man who has to tear down the thoughts of others because he has none of his own.

: Difference is, I KNOW my opinion on this topic means jack. 81K people have died, and over a million are infected, but, hey, let's listen to you over the experts. Fauci issued a dire warning today not to re-open too soon. But, again, you seem to know more.....let's open up all the schools in August, when it may not be safe, so selfish people, like you, can go back to work. Then, let's watch it spike, we close down again, and we miss basketball season. I'll come back here then, but you'll be hiding. It is an even smaller man, who, when confronted with science and numbers, refuses to look at them because he's a selfish jerk who wants to sacrifice lives so he can get his hair cut!

Finally we agree: your opinion means jack.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ SoCalHoops Womens Forum ] [ FAQ ]