Re: Pasadena

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ SoCalHoops Womens Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by I told you so! on January 04, 2020 at 18:13:26:

In Reply to: Re: Pasadena posted by You can't read on January 04, 2020 at 12:18:44:

: : : : The Burroughs players were bigger and faster and had a better coach. Burroughs is sure to be an Open team this year, but we hung with them the whole game! Oh and if it wasn't for those HORRIBLE refs we would have won!!

: : : : : LMAO!!!!! Pasadena lost to Burroughs by 2! So much for the elite transfers and being a borderline Open team. LMAO!! Pasadena parents need to STFU now. Just be quiet. I can't wait to hear the excuses on this one!! Great job Burroughs!!

: : : Like I said. The guard transfers are average players. The post is very good. Bottom line the best player in the league is out for at least another month for Pasadena and without her they are just a good team. Nothing more

: : But with all of your elite transfers that average 50 points a game you don't need the "best player in the league" Pasadena should have beaten Burroughs by 20+ because of those great transfers. I guess those transfers are worthless if the best player is already on the team. LOL!! All of those players and transfers and talk and because Pasadena is missing one kid now the team is garbage. Too funny!!

: Their best player who's top D1 in the country didn't play and only lost by 2. Not to mention the refs were terrible. Once the player in the game, watch out!

Okay okay! Now the trolls have come out. This can’t possibly be a Pasadena parent. Even they aren’t that delusional. Their player isn’t even the top D1 player in the San Gabriel Valley or Pasadena and it could be debated whether she’s the best in the Pacific League. She’s definitely could’ve helped but she’s not going to put them over by 20 points.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ SoCalHoops Womens Forum ] [ FAQ ]