Re: Pasadena

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ SoCalHoops Womens Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by POS on January 04, 2020 at 00:12:57:

In Reply to: Re: Pasadena posted by First of all on January 03, 2020 at 23:10:32:

: : The Burroughs players were bigger and faster and had a better coach. Burroughs is sure to be an Open team this year, but we hung with them the whole game! Oh and if it wasn't for those HORRIBLE refs we would have won!!

: : : LMAO!!!!! Pasadena lost to Burroughs by 2! So much for the elite transfers and being a borderline Open team. LMAO!! Pasadena parents need to STFU now. Just be quiet. I can't wait to hear the excuses on this one!! Great job Burroughs!!

: Like I said. The guard transfers are average players. The post is very good. Bottom line the best player in the league is out for at least another month for Pasadena and without her they are just a good team. Nothing more

But with all of your elite transfers that average 50 points a game you don't need the "best player in the league" Pasadena should have beaten Burroughs by 20+ because of those great transfers. I guess those transfers are worthless if the best player is already on the team. LOL!! All of those players and transfers and talk and because Pasadena is missing one kid now the team is garbage. Too funny!!

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ SoCalHoops Womens Forum ] [ FAQ ]