Posted by flagrant foul question on April 01, 2017 at 22:44:29:
In Reply to: Re: Katie Lou posted by wondering the same thing! on April 01, 2017 at 21:40:12:
: : : : : : ...if the officials went to replay and reviewed
: : : : : : it and confirmed it was a foul then, it is what it
: : : : : : is for pete sake, don't try to make it
: : : : : : something it is not, geez.
: : : : : nm
: : : : :All you haters can say all you want but at the end of the day, her b-ball career is 10x better than your daughter will ever be. She is better than your daughter, lol
: : : She is no where near being So Cal's Finest. She never won anything as a team. She could not get her high school team over the hump. She was out with a broken foot last year for the championship game and had Breanna Stewart on the team. This year she could not help the team win in the Final Four. Enough said !!!!!!
: : So how was the foul on Karnowski not a flagrant foul when he got wacked in the face and Samuelson was barely nicked on the chin?
: Are the rules different for men and women?
The announcers said for the women that anytime you get hit in the face it is automatically a flagrant foul. Is that not the same for men? It's actually good that they called it because if SC had won and they hadn't called that foul, it could have tainted the SC win through commentary.
Post a Followup