Posted by So true on January 16, 2019 at 16:12:34:
In Reply to: Re: Windward vs Sierra Canyon posted by Media is a joke on January 16, 2019 at 13:04:05:
: : : : : : : : : : Call your shot before the game starts...
: : : : : : : : : : I'll go Sierra Canyon by 4.
: : : : : : : : : : Bonus Pick: Chaminade over Harvard Westlake by 7.
: : : : : : : : : Sierra by 16
: : : : : : : :
: : : : : : : : Sierra leads the whole way and solidifies it's hold on top seed in Open Division.
: : : : : : : : Chaminade destroyed Harvard Westlake and seems to be on track now. If they run the table in the Mission League can they sneak into Open?
: : : : : : : : Big game on Saturday is even bigger now - Sierra Canyon vs. Chaminade.
: : : : : : : Sierra canyon vs Chaminade should be a fun game to watch
: : : : : : Whose home game is it Saturday?
: : : : : After seeing watching that game these two are definitely the best Back court in Ca. People can say whatever but these two have arrived and taken over . The Senior back court out of Bishop M. are good but it looks like they have maxed out while these two juniors have more upside to their game and playing better right now.
: : : : Really happy for Sierra Canyon and their big win over Windward. There was so much anticipation for the big matchup and SC showed why they are on top. Great coaching, incredible team players. De Jesus outplayed Osborne and I was really impressed with her composure and confidence. She will be a force to reckon with. I think a BM vs SC matchup will be a good one and my prediction for the open division finals. Both backcourts are strong and will be fun to watch. Not sure about the reference to the BM guards "maxed out". They've carried their team to impressive wins. Consistency will be key. I think Redondo will challenge SC to a competitive gave later this month.
: : : The back courts for SC and BM are both great. The reference guards was to previous post (different thread) as to who were better. I held my opinion till I watched last nights matchup. My conclusion is SC guards have more in individual arsenal of skills and being Juniors having a much better upside va BM guards who what I see as one dimensional (no disrespect). Also BM guards need the ball to be effective as opposed to SC guards play within the structure and points come to them in the flow of the offense (doesnít look forced). Itís jmo and still think BM guards are good but SC guards are doing a little more and a little better. As a whole SC team has put a strangle hold on the #1 spot for the time being.
: : Iím just glad that these top guards are finally being recognized as top tier players. The media seems to focus on just one SS guard and although she is a talent, there have been several guards that have outplayed her this season who donít get nearly the recognition that she does. JMO. I like that the talent is more spread out amongst several schools and some new names are in the race. Great job to all the players who continue to grind and are hungry for a ship!
: Exactly! So called media especially the short guy that covers California is so agenda driven itís rediculous. Iím not hating on girls who get hyped but when other girls outplay the best players all of sudden this guy and others donít tweet or speak on the games. But than goes on rants about accountability, players not attending his events, and other media outlets copying his ideas.. There are a lot of great b-ball players like guards mentioned above but they are not in the in crowd . Itís sad but oh well.
Exactly, just look at ESPN Hoopgurlz. There are deserving girls on that list but there are plenty that makes you scratch your head, lol. It is what it is. But no worries, that is why scouts go out to events both HS and clubs because they know alot of these girls are getting passed on, they don't rely on these so called evaluators that have their own personal agenda.
Post a Followup