Re: Marlborough 54 Alemany 39

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ SoCalHoops Womens Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Nade 8+ on January 10, 2019 at 17:09:44:

In Reply to: Re: Marlborough 54 Alemany 39 posted by Observer on January 10, 2019 at 15:01:05:

: : : : : : : : Marlborough is a solid team but too lose by 15pts in the league opener after playing so well to start the season??? Alemany must have injured players right? They can't be at full strength right? Someone please fill me in.

: : : : : : :
: : : : : : : They've been playing without their starting big and PG lately including tonight. And they are not deep.

: : : : : : Or maybe Marlborough is just that good. We'll find out Friday when they play Nade. They beat Chaminade then I'd say they're legit. Even thought Nade this season is not the same Chaminade couple of seasons ago, if you follow girls basketball you know what am saying

: : : : : Any Chaminade score tonight?

: : : : Chaminade didn't play; first league game is tonight vs. Marlborough.

: : : I Have Nade winning by 10pts and a good game to watch

: : Marlborough can handle Chaminade's inside play. M by 6 on the road.

: My $$$ is on Nade because of Whitfield-Hunter-Rodriguez trio, they got more playing experience than the young Marlborough squad. But just like Nade, Marlborough is well coach. They make proper adjustments depending on matchups. And Montgomery is one scoring machine. They went deep couple years ago in CIF and States before Dejesus transferred to Sierra. It will be a big test for this young squad tonight.

I take chaminade also , I've seen both play and the mission league will come down to H.W and Nade. Alemany is a mess right now but I think Marlboro will do well and should finish 3rd in Mission league.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ SoCalHoops Womens Forum ] [ FAQ ]