Re: Chino Hills is not better w/o Ball


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Mens Message Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by truth on December 06, 2017 at 04:52:54:

In Reply to: Re: Chino Hills is not better w/o Ball posted by Better even if they are worse on December 05, 2017 at 21:15:39:

: : : Yall can stop with the Chino is better w/o Ball player now. They do not have a chance vs the better SoCal teams without him. Before it's let me see who is gonna win. Now it's just mark em down for a 20pt L.

: : :Much better !

: If they go 0 and 25 this year they are better off without the Big Bully Bufoon and the circus.

As if 'Melo was the reason they were good? Don't thay have a pretty good kid now playing up on the hill at Loyola Marymount? Don't they have a kid who should've chosen UCRiverside or CSFullerton, but was at UCLA, also gone off the roster? Take 2 mid-major D1 kids off a high school team and there WILL be some drop-off. That's as big a reason why they aren't as dominant.
But, take Daddy out of the gym, out of the coach's office, out of the admin building, and let him stay home, and everyone is far better off. Not a question. The UCLA basketball team is feeling the same way. The Lakers are now wondering what they got themselves into. Can a team like Fullerton benefit if a guy with LiAngelo's size/ability? Sure they can. No way they should even consider it, though. Can a team benefit with 'Melo? Sure. But no way should they consider it. Don't be surprised if UCLA pulls their offer and if every other program ignores them.


Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Mens Message Forum ] [ FAQ ]