Re: Cif .500 rule is terrible


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Mens Message Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Yes on February 07, 2017 at 10:34:45:

In Reply to: Re: Cif .500 rule is terrible posted by Agreed on February 07, 2017 at 10:16:39:

: : Don't like it communicated late and added in November. If true why would anyone challenge themselves w schedule next year? Awful rule especially for low division teams.

: I think if you are below .500 but ranked in your division, you should still be allowed at-large. It would entice low division teams to still play a hard schedule and would give benefits to those in harder leagues. That or cap the playoffs at 32 teams and allow more at large teams in lower divisions. I know some under .500 teams that would smack some over .500 teams in their same division.

How are they going to fill 32 spots without taking under .500 teams?? What a joke rule... changed divisions for better competitive play then added a bullcrap .500 rule to hurt lower level teams



Follow Ups:



Post a Followup

Name:
E-Mail:

Subject:

Comments:

Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:


[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Mens Message Forum ] [ FAQ ]