Re: Foothill Finish(ed)

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Mens Message Forum ] [ FAQ ]

Posted by Funny on January 26, 2017 at 16:55:10:

In Reply to: Foothill Finish(ed) posted by Parent Lines on January 26, 2017 at 15:34:31:

: Okay here is the recap of where they are and more importantedly where they are going:

: 1. Hart (3-2) losses to Saugus and West Ranch. Kelly will avenge the WR loss but don't think they win out. 4-1, Finish 7-3. Exit 2nd round, no seniors.

: 1. Saugus (3-2) losses to Valencia and GV. They avenge both losses but lose to Hart for the League title tie 4-1, Finish 7-3. Chemistry is better, if they don't face size in the playoffs they might win a game or two....however there is always size. 1st round exit.

: 3. West Ranch (3-2) losses to Valencia and Saugus. Interesting team depends on health and lack of foul long as Shant stays focused they can go 3-2 but count on 2-3.....Finish 5-5. 2nd Round exit. Does Shant get sent packing???

: 3. Valencia (3-2) losses to GV and Hart. Phillips gets it back versus GV not vs Hart.....they will lose elsewhere too for 2-3 in last 5. Finish 5-5. 1st round exit.

: 5. GV (3-2) losses to Hart and West Ranch. Keyes has no backcourt and everyone knows it.....they go 1-4 down the stretch (They hold Galuppo to 50 in rematch). Finish 4-6. Keyes faxes cif paperwork to wrong number, miss the playoffs.

: 6. Canyon its win friday or go 0-10.

Love the part about Keyes faxing paperwork to the wrong number!!!
Very interesting take. Seriously though, is SCV basketball really that good? Coaches are all corrupt, parent-coach politics are shady as ever, and the competition is not like it used to be.
And for the record- I do not play basketball nor does my son/daughter.

Follow Ups:

Post a Followup




Optional Link URL:
Link Title:
Optional Image URL:

[ Follow Ups ] [ Post Followup ] [ Mens Message Forum ] [ FAQ ]